News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMine9-11 — Viewing Item


Pre attack { September 26 2001 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4264545,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4264545,00.html

Attack and counter-attack

Evidence suggests that Washington had planned to move against Bin Laden in the summer. Was the attack on America a pre-emptive strike?

David Leigh
Guardian

Wednesday September 26, 2001


Did Bin Laden decide to get his retaliation in first? And did the new Bush administration make a horrible miscalculation by taking an ill-informed, "tough guy" approach to their fanatical Islamist opponent ?

These are the troubling questions raised by the Guardian's disclosure at the weekend that the Taliban received a specific warning - passed during secret diplomacy in Berlin in July - that the Bush team had prepared a new plan to topple the entire Afghan regime militarily unless they handed Bin Laden over.

If it turns out that our future safety is in the hands of those who might possibly have averted the horror of September 11 by behaving more cautiously, then we owe it to history to establish the true record. But we can be certain that no one presently in charge in Washington will want to do that.

The Guardian's disclosures are proving controversial. Some analysts say Bin Laden had evidently prepared his suicide pilots up to a year beforehand, thus making Washington's behaviour in July beside the point. Others ask why US threats of military strikes in July should be of any more concern to Bin Laden than previous episodes, such as Clinton's rocketing of his camps.

We need to assess the evidence of the Bush team's foreign policy dealings this year to find the answers. This is made easier by the fact that two major players have now come out of the woodwork.

First, President Putin made clear he had tried to egg on the previous Clinton administration - without success - to act militarily against the whole Taliban regime: "Washington's reaction at the time really amazed me. They shrugged their shoulders and said matter-of-factly: 'We can't do anything because the Taliban does not want to turn him over'."

And then Clinton himself disclosed what limited - and equally unsuccessful - action he had been prepared to attempt by secret executive order. He said on Saturday: "I authorised the arrest and, if necessary, the killing of Osama bin Laden and we actually made contact with a group in Afghanistan to do it." Speaking to reporters in New York, he added: "We also trained commandos for a possible ground action, but we did not have the necessary intelligence to do it in the way we would have had to do it."

So Bush came into office this January against a background of American (and Clintonian) failure. While running for president the previous October, he said he was "saddened and angered" by the "cowardly attack" on the destroyer the USS Cole, and added: "There must be consequences."

As the outgoing senior official at the state department in charge of Afghanistan, Karl Inderfurth, remarked: "The Bush administration will have many urgent problems to face and, unfortunately, Afghanistan will be one of those because of terrorism and Bin Laden... Those problems are getting worse".

Although support from Pakistan, its southern neighbour, seemed to render the regime invulnerable, there were signs early this year that Washington was moving to threaten Afghanistan militarily from the north, via the wild former Soviet republics.

A US department of defence official, Dr Jeffrey Starr, visited Tajikistan in January. The Guardian's Felicity Lawrence established that US Rangers were also training special troops inside Kyrgyzstan. There were unconfirmed reports that Tajik and Uzbek special troops were training in Alaska and Montana.

And US General Tommy Franks visited Dushanbe on May 16, where he conveyed a message from the Bush administration that the US considered Tajikistan "a strategically significant country". On offer was non-lethal military aid. Tajikistan used the occasion to apply to join Nato's Partnership for Peace.

Shortly afterwards the Republican senator from Alabama who is vice-chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, Richard C Shelby, returned from a Gulf tour to bullishly tell the Washington Post that US counterterrorism officials were winning the war against Bin Laden. "He's on the run, and I think he will continue to be on the run, because we are not going to let up." He went on: "I don't think you could say he's got us hunkered down. I believe he's more hunkered down... He knows he's hunted."

Reliable western military sources say a US contingency plan existed on paper by the end of the summer to attack Afghanistan from the north. Throughout the spring, FBI information suggests terrorist suicide pilots were continuing to train at US aviation schools. But whatever contingency plan of theirs existed, no one pushed the terrorist button. By July 8, the Afghan opposition, Pakistani diplomats, and senior staff from the British Foreign Office, were gathering at Weston Park under UN auspices for private teach-ins on the Afghan situation.

And a couple of weeks later, another group gathered in a Berlin hotel. There, former state department official Lee Coldren passed on a message he had got from Bush officials: "I think there was some discussion of the fact that the United States was so disgusted with the Taliban that they might be considering some military action." Karl Inderfurth was there too, and former ambassador to Pakistan, Tom Simons.

The chilling quality of this private warning was that it came - according to one of those present, the Pakistani diplomat Niaz Naik - accompanied by specific details of how Bush would suceed where Clinton had failed.

The hawks in Washington could count on the connivance of Russian troops, and on facilities in such places as Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, already host to US military advisers.

The message that thus went back via Pakistan to the Taliban was that the hawks in Washington thought they were backing Bin Laden into a corner. Unfortunately, he decided to push his own button, instead.



binladen
doubts-official-story
epa-air-quality
flight-schools
flight11-aa-wtc
flight77-aa-pentagon
flight93-ua
forewarned
inquiry
insurance-scam
investigation-pre911
lawsuits
norad-faa-response
not-focused-on-terror
pakistan
questions
saudis
suspects
sympathy-for-attacks
taliban
wtc-collapse
105 terrorists visas
9 11 commision { May 23 2003 }
9 11 terror attack binladen
911 flight controller handled egypt air flight 990
911 gas theory
911 suspect related wtc93 plotter { June 5 2002 }
911 widow ellen mariani letter to bush { December 1 2003 }
Air traffic controllers recall events { September 11 2002 }
Bush attends 911 memorial then fundraiser
Bush reaction { December 4 2001 }
Car bomb explodes outside state department on september 11
Cheney recalls taking charge from bunker { September 11 2001 }
Congress to investigating 911 loan abuses { September 9 2005 }
Day of the attack
Debunking conspiracy theorists
Deception
Evidence shows 911 attacks were delayed
Fbi grabs ap fedex document { May 8 2003 }
Fbi john oneill gets his own mini series { May 2 2005 }
Federal protective services deny car bomb occured
From the cockpits
Goss refuses to discipline cia officials for 911 lapse { October 5 2005 }
Government denies access to 911 tapes and transcripts { February 9 2005 }
Investigating the hijackings { July 23 2004 }
John oneill { September 12 2001 }
Man claims living wife died on 911 { February 5 2004 }
Nearly half newyork dead not identified
Need new pearl harbor { September 11 2001 }
New 911 cia report finds fault with cia officials { August 26 2005 }
Non arabic { September 19 2002 }
Number of rny dead 2000 less tally { October 26 2001 }
Ny fd releases 911 oral histories transmissions { August 12 2005 }
Palestinians candy
Pilots of hijacked flights on 911
Port authority releases 911 transcipts { August 29 2003 }
Pre attack { September 26 2001 }
Rare tape of wtc attacks surfaces
Reichstag fire { September 13 2002 }
Six years later bush consistently cites 911
Sora friedman
Sound recorded { August 7 2002 }
Springsteen sings { July 30 2002 }
Tumbling woman art [jpg]
Tumbling woman art { September 18 2002 }
Two white suspects in bin laden probe
Wash post offers free ads for 911 pentagon event { August 16 2005 }
Wtc_devil [jpg]

Files Listed: 47



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple