News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine cabal-elite international-banking predatory Viewing Item | Citigroup 200m Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.cnn.com/2002/BUSINESS/09/06/citigroup.reut/index.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2002/BUSINESS/09/06/citigroup.reut/index.html
Citigroup may pay $200M in FTC case? NEW YORK, Sept 6 (Reuters) --Citigroup Inc is close to an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission to pay about $200 million to settle allegations of ``predatory lending'' to consumers, The Wall Street Journal reported in its online edition Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.
The talks could still fall apart -- settlement talks between the two have failed before -- but both sides believe an agreement could be announced this month, the Journal reported.
If Citigroup, the largest U.S. financial-services company, ultimately pays around $200 million, it would be the largest consumer-protection settlement with the FTC and by far the biggest amount ever paid in a predatory-lending case, according to the Journal article.
Predatory lending is generally viewed as mortgage lending that unfairly takes advantage of consumers, especially those with poor credit histories, through abusive practices such as deceptive marketing or unnecessary refinancings to generate fees, according to the Journal article.
The proposed FTC settlement would end a suit filed by the commission in a federal court in Atlanta in March 2001 against Associates First Capital Corp, a Dallas-based sub-prime lender that Citigroup acquired in November 2000 for $27 billion. Citigroup and its own consumer-finance unit, CitiFinancial, into which Associates was merged, also are defendants.
Among the alleged abuses that occurred at Associates: deceptive marketing practices; inducing borrowers to unknowingly purchase optional insurance on loans, and abusive debt-collecting practices.
|
| Files Listed: 8 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|