News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine security bigbrother spying denver-police Viewing Item | Doubt police ease spying { February 21 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_1760729,00.htmlhttp://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_1760729,00.html
Some doubt police will cease spying By Kevin Vaughan, Rocky Mountain News February 21, 2003
A tough policy on police intelligence gathering is no guarantee that officers won't violate the rights of peaceful, law-abiding citizens.
That was the sentiment of several of those who spoke during more than 2 ½ hours of testimony at a public hearing Thursday night on Denver's "spy files" controversy.
"Putting the right words in the right order in a policy is not enough," said Mark Silverstein, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado. "You can't draft the right policy and then put it in a drawer and forget about it."
He and others told the Public Safety Review Commission that Denver needs a specific policy on intelligence gathering as well as extensive training for officers and independent oversight to prevent a recurrence of the current controversy. The city has been sued by groups and individuals who contend their constitutional rights were violated when police officers watched them at public protests.
"No policy is going to be effective absent real accountability of the Denver Police Department to the citizens of this city," said Mark Cohen, one of the more than 3,000 individuals who is the subject of an intelligence file.
The commission has limited powers to investigate complaints against Denver police officers and sheriff's deputies. It can suggest discipline but cannot impose it.
Commission members took the testimony under advisement and expect to meet again soon to discuss their next step.
Speakers suggested several ways the city could prevent abuses in the future:
• Adopt a strongly worded policy that spells out the specific circumstances in which police officers are allowed to gather intelligence on individuals and groups.
• Establish a system of independent oversight. Several of those who spoke said the Public Safety Review Commission's powers should be greatly expanded to give it independent investigative powers.
• Create a mechanism to mete out discipline if abuses occur.
Although the police department was roundly criticized throughout the hearing, the sentiment was not unanimous.
Lisa Dobson, a neighborhood activist who has worked frequently with Denver officers, said intelligence gathering serves a legitimate law enforcement function.
"Intelligence gathered today on an as-yet innocent civilian could prevent the next Harris and Klebold tragedy," Dobson said. "Or the next Timothy McVeigh."
vaughank@RockyMountainNews.com or (303) 892-5019
|
| Files Listed: 5 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|