NewsMine — security — legislation — Viewing Item

Ashcroft relaxes restrictions terror probes { November 6 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-11/106810189449110.xml http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-11/106810189449110.xml Ashcroft relaxes restrictions on potential terror probes Guidelines allow FBI to act without evidence of crime or security threat Thursday, November 06, 2003 BY CURT ANDERSON Associated Press WASHINGTON -- The FBI will be able to more easily check a person's background for potential terrorist activities under national security guidelines issued yesterday by Attorney General John Ashcroft. Civil libertarians said the rules could invite abuses against innocent people. The guidelines enable the FBI to conduct a "threat assessment" of potential terrorists or terrorist activity without initial evidence of a crime or national security threat, as required to begin a more formal preliminary or full investigation. The purpose is to ensure the FBI approaches these investigations "with an eye toward early intervention and prevention of acts of terrorism before they occur," according to the guidelines. The FBI will be allowed to collect information on "individuals, groups and organizations of possible investigative interest" in national security cases in the ways that agents already can in cases involving more traditional crimes such as illegal drugs and organized crime. Ashcroft issued similar revised guidelines for these traditional criminal investigations in May 2002. The FBI still would have to get court approval in terrorism and espionage cases for a more intrusive technique such as a wiretap or search warrant. But the relaxed guidelines would, for example, enable the FBI to run a credit check on an individual or run a person's name through law enforcement databases without opening a formal investigation. Timothy Edgar, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the guidelines raise another caution flag in the nation's fight against terrorism. The ACLU and others have criticized the anti-terrorism Patriot Act that expanded government's surveillance and detention powers after the Sept. 11 attacks. "This is exactly what Americans are worried about," he said. "It's the notion that the government can put your life under a microscope without any evidence that you're doing anything wrong." Edgar said the changes could mark a return to the days when the FBI routinely opened investigations on Vietnam War protesters and other dissidents, before the first national security investigation guidelines were issued in 1976. But Justice Department officials said FBI actions under the revised guidelines remain under supervision of both the department and Congress, and that agents still would have to observe all constitutional and legal protections. "These guidelines maintain the important safeguards of individual rights while updating our investigatory practices to meet the new priority of preventing terrorists from killing innocent Americans," Justice spokesman Mark Corallo said. The guidelines require the FBI to share more information with federal agencies and with state and local officials about such things as terrorist threats. Local police and safety officials have frequently complained about the vagueness of information regarding threats and investigations in their communities. In addition, the FBI will have to notify the deputy attorney general if officials at headquarters turn down a field office's proposal to initiate a preliminary or full national security investigation. This is aimed at preventing a recurrence of the situation involving accused Sept. 11 plotter and avowed al Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui. In that case, the FBI's field office in Minneapolis was barred by headquarters from aggressively investigating Moussaoui before the attacks. Copyright 2003 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with permission.

1996-terror-law 911-intelligence-overhaul budget canada cia dissent fbi homeland-security national-secrets patriot-act ridge-testify shadow Ashcroft relaxes restrictions terror probes { November 6 2003 } Australia defends anti terror measures { November 9 2005 } Beefs nuclear { March 3 2002 } Britain removes more liberties in terror legislation Britain terrorism act 2000 { December 4 2003 } Bureau immigration customsenforcement Bush alters commission recommendation for spy chief { August 3 2004 } Bush considers speedy moves on 911 report Cia like counterterror center urged { July 23 2004 } Domestic terrorist Expanded patriot act cover internet { November 25 2003 } Gop wants keep anti terror laws { April 9 2003 } Ice tracks aliens { May 15 2003 } Ins split { April 25 2002 } Judicial crisis { May 3 2002 } More powers 2003 { February 8 2003 } New jersey teens charged under terror law { March 2006 } No directors North command Over bitter opposition blairs antiterror bill passes { March 12 2005 } Seizing dictatorial power { November 15 2001 } Senator proposes US MI5 as alternative to FBI { March 27 2007 } Sweeping new powers in uk on terror { February 22 2004 } Terror law used pursue crimes drugs swindling Terror laws against common criminals { September 9 2003 } Victory act treat drug dealers terrorists Workers rights homeland { July 26 2002 } Files Listed: 27

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.